Client Accounts
What Clients Say
They reconstructed three years of cold-storage movements from my handwritten notes and exchange CSVs. The bound ledger sits in my safe deposit box now — exactly what I wanted for estate planning.— H.S., retired engineer, Busan · Annual Ledger Archive, 2024
The archive was thorough, though I wish they had flagged one ambiguous transfer earlier. Still, the final volume answered every question my accountant raised.— M.K., small business owner, Seoul · Annual Ledger Archive, 2025
I had kept my own spreadsheet for years but never felt confident it was complete. The integrity review found two missing internal transfers I had overlooked. Took longer than I hoped, but the report was worth the wait.— J.L., university lecturer, Daejeon · Archive Integrity Review, 2024
Clear communication throughout. The movement documentation for my wallet migration to a new hardware device is now part of my family trust file.— R.T., physician, Jeonju · Movement Documentation, 2025
Extended Account: The Park Family Archive
Client: Park family, Jeonju Service: Three-year Annual Ledger Compilation Challenge: Father held Bitcoin since 2016 across two hardware wallets and one exchange account. Records were a mix of Korean and English notes, some on paper, some in email drafts.
Approach: Three intake sessions over two months. Soo-jin reconciled 47 total transactions across the period, resolving four date discrepancies with the client. Two volumes were bound — one per wallet source — with a master index.
Outcome: The family received archives suitable for estate planning discussions with their attorney. They noted the process required more back-and-forth than expected but appreciated the final thoroughness.
Extended Account: Multisig Review for a Seoul Consultant
Client: Independent consultant, Seoul Service: Archive Integrity Review Challenge: Client maintained a self-compiled PDF archive for a 2-of-3 multisig setup and wanted verification before a property purchase funded partly from crypto holdings.
Approach: Min-ho compared 23 on-chain transactions against the client’s PDF, verified checksums on the digital copy, and identified one internal transfer recorded with an incorrect date.
Outcome: Corrected archive delivered within twelve business days. Client used the review report during a bank meeting to demonstrate fund provenance.